DITZKREIG

IN 1992, MY EX WIFE EXULTED:" SEE," SHE SAID, "IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHEAPER TO LET ME SPEND WHATEVER I WANTED TO". SHE WAS REFERRING TO THE CRUSHING IMPOVERISHMENT I WAS EXPERIENCING AS A RESULT OF HER DIVORCE HARVEST. FIRSTLY SHE WAS WRONG. SHE HAD IMPOVERISHED ME FOR TEN YEARS THROUGH DIVORCE EXTORTION. I WAS ALREADY IN RAGS WITH A SMASHED UP $500 CAR AND I HAD NOT SPENT A CENT ON MYSELF OR ANY OF MY DECADES LONG PROJECTS SINCE MY HOUSE WAS BURNT DOWN ON JUNE TWENTIETH NINETEEN EIGHTY. SECONDLY THERE WAS NOT A DOLLAR AVAILABLE TO ME UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BY NINETEEN NINETY WHEN SHE MOVED OUT WITH ALL OF  MY  PALTRY CHATTELS. SHE TOOK ALL OF MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND MY PICTURES WHICH PROVED WHAT DAMAGE HAD BEEN DONE HERE AT OTTER POINT AND AT THE BURR HOUSE. THEN SHE STARTED DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS. SHE WAS FURIOUS. SHE EXPECTED TO SPEND FREELY AND I WAS TO PAY FOR IT. SHE, HOWEVER, KNEW ABOUT MY INHERITANCES, AND TOLD HER LAWYER TYLER LUCCIES WHO WROTE TO ME AND IN HIS