DITZKREIG

  LAW ABIDING BY NATURE IT IS NOT IN MY NATURE TO OFFEND.  I AM NOT ANXIOUS TO HARM ANYONE OR TAKE THEIR PROPERTY.  I AGREE WITH THE ENTIRETY OF THE PREMISE THAT EVERYONE BENEFITS FROM A PEACEFUL LAW ORDERED SOCIETY.   Men much like myself have produced laws and rules for hundreds of years and have crafted a code of conduct. I concur. Criminal Police enforced Laws are meant to do with the prevention of and the punishment of acts which cause egregious harm to persons or property.  THERE WAS NO INTENTION BY THE LEGISLATORS TO EMPOWER  UNEVEDINCED AND UNWARRANTED USE OF POLICE AS AGENTS OF PUNISHMENT.   THE PERSONS WHO EXAGGERATE OR FABRICATE COMPLAINTS TO AUTHORITIES TO PUNISH AN INNOCENT PERSON ARE CREATING EGREGIOUS HARM THE FALSE COMPLAINTENTS ARE CRIMINALS. A TERRIBLE FLAW IN THE MODERN INTERPRETATION OF POLICING IS THE RETENTION OF FALSE AND FABRICATED COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE VICTIM          OF THE FALSE INFORMING OR DELIBERATE CONSTANT CALLING IN FALSE COMPLAINTS DESPITE THE VICTIM&

MY RETENTION OF ASSETS TO EFFECT THE PURCHASE OF A FAMILY HOME WAS DECLARED TO BE FLAWED.  THE HOUSE AT OTTER POINT PURCHASED UNFINISHED IN AUGUST 1979 I HAD ALSO PROVIDED A WAY TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY MY EX-WIFE WANTED TO HAVE. DAMN, DOES THIS EVER COMPLICATE THE PROGRESS OF A CAREER AS A WRITER, ARTIST AND MUSICIAN. WHAT IS REQUIRED IS A JOB OR A BUSINESS WHERE TIME WOULD STILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ART, WRITING AND MUSICAL PROJECTS. THEN THE OTTER POINT REDNECK CRIMINAL GANG STOLE AND BURNT EVERYTHING I HAD.  THE BURNING HOUSE AT OTTER POINT JUNE 20 1980 I PLANNED TO REBUILD WHAT I COULD AFFORD. Who were the Palfry madman's accomplices? This is the existing second house which I paid for and like the first one I had to finish it and then work on it and around it. MY EX WIFE HAS FORCED ME TO BUILD A LARGER HOME THAN I THOUGHT I COULD AFFORD THEN SHE WANTED TO BORROW MONEY ON IT FOR HER PROJECTS. I REFUSED TO DO THAT. THIS WAS NOT AN UNFAIR SELFISHNESS. WHY WAS I REQUIRED TO ALLOW MY NEW