Sunday, March 6, 2022

I OWN FRAGILE MUSICAL EQUIPMENT AND LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES I DO NOT WANT TROUBLE OR DESTRUCTION

 

LAW ABIDING BY NATURE

IT IS NOT IN MY NATURE TO OFFEND.  I AM NOT ANXIOUS TO HARM ANYONE OR TAKE THEIR PROPERTY.  I AGREE WITH THE ENTIRETY OF THE PREMISE THAT EVERYONE BENEFITS FROM A PEACEFUL LAW ORDERED SOCIETY.  

Men much like myself have produced laws and rules for hundreds of years and have crafted a code of conduct. I concur. Criminal Police enforced Laws are meant to do with the prevention of and the punishment of acts which cause egregious harm to persons or property. 

THERE WAS NO INTENTION BY THE LEGISLATORS TO EMPOWER  UNEVEDINCED AND UNWARRANTED USE OF POLICE AS AGENTS OF PUNISHMENT.   THE PERSONS WHO EXAGGERATE OR FABRICATE COMPLAINTS TO AUTHORITIES TO PUNISH AN INNOCENT PERSON ARE CREATING EGREGIOUS HARM THE FALSE COMPLAINTENTS ARE CRIMINALS.

A TERRIBLE FLAW IN THE MODERN INTERPRETATION OF POLICING IS THE RETENTION OF FALSE AND FABRICATED COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE VICTIM          OF THE FALSE INFORMING OR DELIBERATE CONSTANT CALLING IN FALSE COMPLAINTS DESPITE THE VICTIM'S INNOCENCE. 

Elected officials say they do not interfere with Police but the falsely accused should not be dumped into a complaint process for criminals where Police declare complaintents hostile and dangerous and try to punish the victimized person  and raid in force saying that Police are in danger. 

Police do not want to act to apprehend the serious offenders who falsely inform Police, commit perjurious acts making false phone complaints and are targeting and stalking another person, which is the serious offence, criminal harassment. Police consider the complaints as against them, will not cough up the false informers identity and will not investigate themselves.  

POLICE CLAIM THEY ARE ENDANGERED BY VICTIMS WHO POSE NO DANGER DEMANDING A LAW ORDERED SOCIETY FREE FROM PUNISHMENT AND DEFAMATION THROUGH THE USE OF FALSE INFORMING AND EXAGGERATION      BY PERSONS WHO ARE  IN NO DANGER AND DO NOT NEED POLICE PROTECTION.

ROLE-PLAYING, WHERE ALL OF THE OWNER OF FAMILY ASSETS CONTROL IS FLIPPED TO A SPOUSE WHO HAD NOT ACCUMULATED ASSETS, CREATES A TRAGEDY

MY RETENTION OF ASSETS TO EFFECT THE PURCHASE OF A FAMILY HOME WAS DECLARED TO BE FLAWED. 

I HAD ALSO PROVIDED A WAY TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY MY EX-WIFE WANTED TO HAVE. DAMN, DOES THIS EVER COMPLICATE THE PROGRESS OF A CAREER AS A WRITER, ARTIST AND MUSICIAN. WHAT IS REQUIRED IS A JOB OR A BUSINESS WHERE TIME WOULD STILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ART, WRITING AND MUSICAL PROJECTS. THEN THE OTTER POINT REDNECK CRIMINAL GANG STOLE AND BURNT EVERYTHING I HAD. 

THE BURNING HOUSE AT OTTER POINT JUNE 20 1980

I PLANNED TO REBUILD WHAT I COULD AFFORD.



Who were the Palfry madman's accomplices?



This is the existing second house which I paid for and like the first one I had to finish it and then work on it and around it.

MY EX WIFE HAS FORCED ME TO BUILD A LARGER HOME THAN I THOUGHT I COULD AFFORD THEN SHE WANTED TO BORROW MONEY ON IT FOR HER PROJECTS. I REFUSED TO DO THAT. THIS WAS NOT AN UNFAIR SELFISHNESS. WHY WAS I REQUIRED TO ALLOW MY NEW WIFE TO SPEND WHATEVER SHE WANTED TO?


MY EX WIFE DID NOT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF SPENDING. THAT WAS NOT A CONCERN TO HER. SHE THOUGHT I WAS FAR TOO PREOCCUPIED WITH NOT GETTING INTO DEBT.


MY EX WIFE AND MANY WOMEN BELIEVED THAT THEY WERE JUST AS GOOD AS MEN WERE AT RUNNING THINGS WHILE THEY CONTINUED TO FAIL TO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS AND DEBT.


I GOT MARRIED AT A TIME WHEN MEN DID ALL OF THE SUPPORTING OF THE FAMILY AND THEY WERE ABLE TO JUMP ONLY AS HIGH AS THEY COULD. NO ONE TOLD THEM JUMP AND I WILL TELL YOU HOW HIGH.


MY EX WIFE PLAYED AT BEING "THE OPERATOR OF A MAJOR BUSINESS".


SHE HAD ENGINEERED A "ROLE SWAP". I SPENT THE NEXT TEN YEARS COOKING, CLEANING AND EVEN TRIMMING, WHICH HAD BEEN A FEMALE JOB PRIMARILY. MY EX WIFE REFUSED TO DO ANY OF THE TASKS WOMEN USUALLY DID AND I HAD TO ASSUME THEM INSTEAD OF DOING THE ART, WRITING AND MUSICAL PROJECTS OR THE JOB OR BUSINESS I NEEDED. WITH HER IN CHARGE "CHEAP" WAS OVER.





DEFICIT FINANCING.

I WAS NOT IN DEFICIT UNTIL MY EX-WIFE WITH HER FLAGRANT DEFICIT FINANCING TOOK OVER AND BEFORE SHE WAS THROUGH I OWED MORE THAN I HAD EARNED...